|
Hunter Success
- By Steve Marshall
Ask any outfitter about the questions prospective
hunters ask when making inquiries about a hunt and
you'll find the topic of hunter success rate at or
near the top of the list. When you're finally about
to make that long dreamed about hunt out west for elk
or to Alaska for sheep and grizzly, you naturally want
to do your homework and get the best outfitter you can
afford. And it stands to reason that the best
outfitters always sport the highest success rates and
are the ones to pick for your hunt, right? Well, the
answer is usually, but not always. A lot of factors
go into determining an outfitters success rate. Some
of these factors are within an outfitter's control and
some are not. If you're going to put a lot of
emphasis on success rates in picking an outfitter,
you'd better understand what determines them.
Depending on what you're looking for in a hunt, the
outfitter simply quoting the highest success rate may
or may not be the right one for you.
First of all, be very careful about
putting too much emphasis on a single year's results.
In a given year a number of factors can combine to
make a mediocre outfitter look great or a great
outfitter look poor. For one thing, weather can play
a big factor in success rates. Many a mountain hunt
has been hurt by a long streak of heavy rains, or
worse, low ceilings that obscure visibility with dense
fog. Heavy early snow can force guides and their
hunters down out of prime game ranges prematurely. On
the other hand, the weather can be literally too nice
for good hunting. In some areas outfitters depend on
high country storms and deep snows to push game down
from high elevations, or out of parks or refuge
areas to areas where they are accessible. Also
success rates on elk plummet in areas that experience
unusually hot, dry falls. Under such conditions the
elk aren't very vocal during the rut and don't range
widely. They tend to be active mainly at night; and
they spend their daylight hours in thick, black, north
slope timber where they are very difficult to
approach.
Another factor affecting success
rate is the type of hunt booked. Some outfitters
offer both general hunts and higher priced trophy
hunts. Trophy hunts are usually 10 days or more in
length and are usually one guide per hunter affairs.
General hunts are normally shorter, 5 to 7 day affairs
and have 2 or even 3 hunters per guide. Obviously,
longer hunts usually sport higher success rates.
Longer hunts give you more time to locate a good
trophy. If you miss your first chance, you might
still have enough time to find another. Also, a few
days bad weather that's a minor irritation on a long
hunt, can be a total disaster on a short one.
Further, the number of hunters per
guide can spell the difference between success and
failure. While two hunters per guide can be O.K. for
some types of hunts, for example antelope or caribou,
it can affect success rates on other types of hunts.
Take, for instance, a two on one, 7 day pack-in elk
trip. Day one is spent packing in. Late in the
afternoon of day three, after two days of hunting,
your buddy drops a nice bull. Most likely day four
will find your guide spending his time skinning,
caping, and packing meat. That leaves just two days
for the guide to get you onto another elk before you
have to pack out. That's a mighty tough order to fill
even if things run smoothly. Throw in a couple of
days lost to bad weather, or a blown shot and it
becomes an impossibility. When you talk to
outfitters about success rates, make sure you know the
hunter to guide ratio. It can make a huge difference.
Another big factor to consider when
talking success rate is trophy quality. For example,
a few years ago my brother-in-law hunted elk in
Colorado. Out of a party of 10 hunters, nine took
elk. A super 90% success rate! However, the biggest
bull taken was a 4x4 with the majority being spikes.
While it was an excellent hunt for sport and produced
some fine eating, it wouldn't have been the right hunt
for someone intent on getting a wall-hanger for over
his fireplace. By and large you can expect success
rates to vary inversely with trophy quality, all other
things being equal. The higher you set your sights,
the tougher it will be to fill your tag. If you'll be
happy with a nice full curl 35 or 36 inch Dall ram,
you might reasonably expect a 90% plus success rate
with the better outfitters. If you can't live without
a 40 incher, you'd better be prepared to make several
trips before you connect !
The final factor that goes into an
outfitter's success rate are the hunters themselves.
Almost all outfitters and guides can relate stories
about working their fannies off for days to get their
hunters into position on nice trophies only to have
them blow easy shots at standing game, sometimes
repeatedly. It's amazing how many hunters still show
up without having sighted in their rifles properly.
Others buy brand new guns, often magnums, for their
first big hunt "out west" and aren't familiar with
them. Still others are dead shots on the target range
but fall to pieces on live game. Even sadder are the
hunters that show up so far out of shape that they
don't even get a chance to blow a shot at game. As
good as some guides are, few are capable of carrying
their hunters piggy-back through the woods. A hunter
who isn't capable a walking more than a couple hundred
yards from a four wheel drive or a horse isn't likely
to boost his outfitter's success rate.
It should be plain by now that in
any one given year a mediocre outfitter might get a
lucky break with the weather, book a high number of
longer one on one trophy hunts, and get hunters that
are in good shape and are dead shots. Such an
outfitter will sport excellent success rates for that
one year. On the other hand, a top notch outfitter
might suffer along with poor hunters and get lousy
breaks with the weather and show a lower success
rate. One year does not a good or a poor outfitter
make. If you're going to be heavily weighing your
choice of outfitters based on past hunter success
rates, make sure you look at more than just last
year's record. Of course you should weigh the most
recent 3 or 4 years success more strongly than
ancient history. Game areas and an outfitter's guides
do change over time. On the other hand, if you can
find an outfitter that can legitimately boast of a
five or ten year record of consistently high success
rates in his area, chances are you've found a dandy.
Such a record indicates an outfitter that is an
extremely good steward of the game populations in his
area and also one that is likely to have excellent
experienced guides that return year after year.
Indeed there is a better way to ask
about your chances of success, a way that is fair to
the outfitter. That is, when you talk to the
outfitter tell him honestly what kind of physical
condition you're in and what kind of shooting ability
you have. Let him know how long a hunt you can afford
and whether you want a one hunter on one guide setup
or prefer to share a guide with another hunter. Let
him know what you're looking for in terms of trophy
quality. Will you settle for a good representative
head, or hold out for a 6x6 bull elk or nothing? Then
ask your outfitter, assuming an average break with the
weather, what he thinks your chances of success would
be. You've got to square with the outfitter if you
expect the outfitter to be honest with you. Of course
you've still got to do your homework and check out
the outfitter's references from both successful and
unsuccessful past clients, ferret out available hunt
reports, and establish a comfort level before you hand
over your deposit.
O.K., having said all of this, what
kind of success rates can you expect on various
hunts. Well, probably some of the highest success
rates can be found on antelope hunts. Success on 11"
to 13" antelope generally runs better than 95% on 3 to
5 day hunts. Of course, if you hold out for a 15" or
16" buck, your chances will drop depending on where
you are hunting. Similarly, mountain lion hunts over
dogs sport high success rates in general. Outfitters
in good lion country and with good dogs usually have
90% plus success. Mountain goat hunts in prime
country would also run well over 90% if hunters were
in proper shape. Goat outfitters will tell you,
however, that it is not unheard of to have hunters on
mixed bag hunts make one climb for goats and then
switch to moose or caribou if they are unsuccessful.
Many caribou hunts are high success
rate affairs also. Better than 90% success rates and
some approaching 100% are common among the top
outfitters chasing Alaskan barren ground caribou,
central Canadian barren ground caribou, mountain
caribou, and Newfoundland's woodland caribou. High
success rates are also common on Quebec Labrador
caribou. But a word of caution is in order here.
Because they have a two caribou limit, Quebec
outfitters often quote success rates in excess of
100%. You'll see success figures like 1.92 caribou
per hunter. Theoretically you could have an outfit
sporting a one caribou per hunter ratio derived from
half their hunters, who were lucky with the migration
timing, shooting 2 bulls each, while the other half
their hunters got skunked. A better way to get a
handle on this situation is to ask the outfitter what
percentage of his hunters failed to take a least one
bull caribou. The days of automatic 100% success on
Quebec caribou are gone. That having been said
however, these hunts can still be one of the better
values in big game hunting today if you go into them
with your eyes open.
The success rate on sheep varies.
Dall and Stone sheep run 80 to 95%, with success on
Dalls running a little higher than on Stones. These
rates are for average sheep with 35" to 38" curls.
Rocky Mountain bighorn are a little harder to come by
on the average. Success can range from below 30% to
50% in the unlimited permit areas of Montana to 70 to
80% in the better areas of Alberta. For Desert
bighorn, the main determinant of success is being
lucky enough to draw a tag. Normally those lucky few
who draw enjoy good success.
There are a lot of outfitters across
the west who consistently run in excess of 90% success
on 4x4 mule deer with 20 - 24" spreads. But if your
heart is set on a 30" plus mulie, you'll likely end up
in old Mexico hunting desert mulies and laying out a
lot more money while facing success rates more like 75
to 80%. Similarly, there are lots of places in Texas
and elsewhere, where whitetail hunters can find
hunting for nice eight point whitetail with 18"
spreads with accompanying 90% success. Again,
however, if you're looking for that monster head that
will score above 160 points, you'll likely find
yourself in Alberta or Saskatchewan facing about 70%
or less odds.
For Alaskan-Yukon moose and Canadian
moose in Newfoundland, success runs 85 - 95% with the
top outfitters pushing the higher number. For
Canadian moose in British Columbia, 80 to 90% seems to
be the norm. For the balance of Canada, success
varies widely between specific provinces and
outfitters with 30 to 50% not being uncommon in the
east. For those lucky enough to draw a Shiras moose
tag in the western US., success can run close to 100%
in some areas. Success varies on bear also. Top brown
bear outfits usually bat better than 90%; but success
frequently is lower when it comes to interior grizzly
where 50 to 80% is a more normal figure. Black bear
success varies also. Some outfitters on Vancouver
Island are consistently near 100% as are outfitters in
Alaska, and Alberta. Further east into Ontario and
Quebec, success varies greatly dependent on bear
densities and the level of baiting, but can rival
their western counterparts.
Suprising to many, one of the
hardest trophies to come by in North America is a good
bull elk. In spite of the relative abundance of these
animals and the number of top flight outfitters in
business, success frequently runs lower than on more
exotic species. Success can range from 25-50% on some
of the shorter, seven day, two hunters to a guide
setups to maybe 90% on some of the better 12 day, one
hunter per guide trophy hunts. And if your definition
of a trophy bull is limited to a big 6x6 as a minimum,
be prepared to accept even lower success rates.
A word of explanation should go
along with these "typical" success figures. The
numbers apply to free range, fair chase hunts, not
fenced "game ranch" hunts. They assume that the hunter
is in reasonable physical condition. They also assume
that the hunter can shoot well enough to hit game,
off-hand, at 80-100 yards; and out to 250 yards with a
decent rest. And they are based on the hunter
concentrating on a single game animal. Success rates
on combination hunts where you're chasing more than
one species generally average somewhat lower than on
hunts that concentrate on one species. Also, the
figures assume that you've booked with some of the
better outfitters in some of the better game ranges in
North America. By no means can all outfitters in all
areas honestly quote such numbers. And you should
expect to pay well for those that can.
Remember this though, as you go
about setting up your hunt: no one can honestly
guarantee you game. If you hunt game under fair chase
conditions, you'd better be prepared to come up empty
handed on occasion. And when you do, you should still
be able to count it as a successful hunt just for the
privilege of being able to match your skills with some
of America's great game animals in wild and beautiful
country. If you limit your definition of success to
always getting game, both you and the sport of
hunting would be better off if you took up golf
instead.
|